The board currently consists of:

• Alexis Arnaud (Université Grenoble Alpes) (2022–present)
• Alicia León y Barella (University of Lille) (2025–present)
• Anthony Moalic (University of Caen Normandy) (2026–present)

"Recherche Data Gouv lends our institutions legitimacy in highlighting the importance of open research data and research data management. As a competence center, being able to rely on this ecosystem is a real asset." — Anthony Moalic

Discover the competence centers network

Antony Fornes (Research Data Valorisation Officer at the Université Côte d’Azur) and Aline Grand (Research Data Administrator at the University of Strasbourg), involved in the Communication working group of EOSC France, as well as Gilles Matthieu (Deputy Director of 'Recherche Data Gouv'), propose to dissect the main concepts relating to the EOSC to better understand the whole.

EOSC, in one (long) sentence

The European Open Science Cloud (EOSC) is an initiative that aims to strengthen the European research data ecosystem by creating a federated infrastructure for sharing and reusing FAIR data.

Head of EOSC

The governance of EOSC is tripartite. It is composed of:

a) the European Commission (Directorates-General for Research and Innovation and Communication Networks, Content and Technology) 
b) the EOSC Association, a Brussels-based non-profit organisation representing the entire EOSC stakeholder community 
c) the EOSC Steering Committee, a group of experts from the European Commission, whose members are representatives of EU Member States and countries associated to Horizon Europe.

Good to know: In France, the EOSC-France College represents the French member organisations of the EOSC Association.

The nodes : EOSC main modus operandi

The EOSC acts by mobilising specific reference communities (national, regional or thematic) or broad collaborations at European level (e.g. digital infrastructures, science hubs, etc.). These federated communities are called EOSC nodes. An EOSC node can be set up by a single organisation or by a consortium of organisations, each with its own internal governance structure and providing resources and services to the Federation. EOSC nodes must be represented within the Federation by a legal entity and comply with the decisions, rules and policies of the Federation. 

But that is not all, the EOSC is also deployed through projects. 

EOSC projects, another way to move forward together

An EOSC project is a concrete and dated object: a consortium of organisations, funded (most often by Horizon Europe, via calls from the "Research Infrastructures" cluster / INFRA-EOSC topics), with a fixed duration, a budget, contract deliverables and a coordinator. 

The EOSC Association works closely with Horizon Europe projects that contribute to the development and deployment of the EOSC; a number of European projects work in direct support of the implementation of the EOSC, while others are carried out in parallel. These projects do not build the EOSC ‘in general’: Each develops a specific brick (a service, a standard, a case of disciplinary use, a competency framework...) that then fits into the ecosystem.

Some examples of EOSC projects

• EOSC Data Commons, whose mission is to contribute to the establishment of the EOSC as the European Research Commons,
• EOSC Beyond, which aims to advance open science and innovation in research, in the context of EOSC,
• or EOSC-ARENA, centered on a sovereign generative and agentic AI environment.

Others cover digital preservation (EOSC EDEN), the creation of secure environments for sensitive data (TITAN, SIESTA), deposits in trusted repositories (FIDELIS), or the creation of a European Quality Reference Framework for Code and Research Software (EVERSE).

The concrete services offered by the EOSC

The EOSC does not function as a single portal that would host all services. It is a federation: each existing brick (national, thematic, disciplinary infrastructure) can offer services. EOSC nodes act as entry points for the various services offered within the EOSC Federation.

The basic logic is mutualization - to avoid redeveloping the same service several times, share the costs of hosting, calculation and management, and ensure that everything is interoperable (FAIR logic). The EOSC EU Node is the nucleus/model of the federation, whose role is to offer a number of common services to the entire federation. Specifically, these are the six generic services: file sharing/synchronisation, interactive notebooks, large file transfer, virtual machines, cloud containers, massive data transfer - the minimum technical base that any European researcher must be able to access. To better understand these services, see this presentation and this Couperin decryption note (in french).

Beyond this common foundation, each actor within the Federation keeps its own services, adapted to its community. EOSC brings together already existing offers, each meeting the specific needs of its field or country. Specifically, for example:

• Data Terra, selected as a thematic node for Earth and environmental sciences, brings its own tools for accessing data and software on the Earth system - built long before the existence of the EOSC, but now made accessible via the federation.
• On the humanities and social sciences side, GoTriple, resulting from the TRIPLE project coordinated by Huma-Num, has become a service supported by the OPERAS infrastructure (led by OpenEdition): a multilingual discovery tool designed specifically for SHS research needs.

And Recherche Data Gouv in the EOSC?

Recherche Data Gouv is a national service, both in terms of its scope and its missions. Its services are mainly offered to the French community. Getting involved at European level has three objectives:

1. Positioning Recherche Data Gouv at the European level. By offering services with high added value beyond our borders, the offer is more visible, gaining influence, while facilitating technical interoperability and international cooperation within a sovereign framework.
2. Facilitate access to EOSC for the community: By increasing the visibility of the services available via EOSC for researchers, but also by facilitating their support through the European network.
3. Use the EOSC lever to improve at the national level. The ecosystem then benefits from the high level of EOSC ‘standards’ to position its services at a high level of demand. In addition, it paves the way for future European funding.

Specifically, Recherche Data Gouv is currently involved in three INFRAEOSC projects:

• FIDELIS, which builds the European network of trusted warehouses (started in January 2025)
• GenAI4earth, which deploys trusted Generative Artificial Intelligence tools and models for the interdisciplinary exploitation and valorisation of Earth System scientific data within the EOSC ecosystem (started in September 2026).
• EOSC-Connect, which aims to federate about twenty national nodes of the EOSC federation (starting in September 2026)

In addition to these projects, Recherche Data Gouv is also involved in the construction of a French national node, a future candidate for integration into the EOSC federation.

Find out more

In June and July 2026, the ESR Research WG and the EOSC-France College organised a series of 3 webinars on the EOSC (in french):

• Bilan sur la stratégie politique : retour sur cinq années au sein de l'EOSC Steering Board
• Retour sur les services EOSC
• Recherche Data Gouv et EOSC : pourquoi et comment envisager la dimension européenne pour un service national

 Access to webinar replays on EOSC

Interview with the Data INRAE team

Is the space backed by a competence centre?

The Data INRAE space relies on the INRAE institutional reference centre and is linked to various local data management clusters, depending on the implementations of the submitting INRAE units.

Which disciplines are primarily represented by this data?

The most represented disciplines are agriculture, biology, food, economics and social and environmental sciences.

What is the process for submitting data? For creating a collection?

Anyone connected with the INRAE ‘identity federation’ can deposit at the root of the institutional space or in one of its three main thematic collections: Experimental-Observation-Simulation, Omics and Surveys & Texts, curation of which is provided by the Data INRAE team. The conditions for filing in other sub-collections (mainly projects or units) depend on the configuration by their administrators.

Anyone wishing to create a collection at the root of the institutional space or in one of its three main thematic collections can request it via a form accessible to INRAE agents. The administrators then manage the creation of their sub-collections and ensure their curation in accordance with the Data INRAE charter.

What curation is carried out on the platform?

In the ‘Omics’ collection, curation is done a priori. It is done a posteriori for the collections ‘Experimental - Observation - Simulation’ and ‘Surveys & Texts’. For the other sub-collections, the curation is done a priori or a posteriori (depending on their settings).

In order to harmonise practices within the space, and to increase the skills of curators, a network has been set up. Virtual classes specific to Data INRAE are regularly offered to this network. In addition, curators or administrators of Data INRAE collections can use the INRAE curation report template on the Data INRAE homepage.

Is there any integration with other repositories?

Yes, Data INRAE is linked to other Recherche Data Gouv institutional spaces or to repositories based on the Dataverse tool, in particular those of the french IRD (Institut de Recherche pour le Développement), CIRAD and CNRS, given the numerous joint research units (UMRs) and partnerships with INRAE.

Links also exist with thematic repositories, for example EMBL-EBI where scientists deposit their raw, often voluminous, data. To store their more synthetic processed data, they then prefer the Recherche Data Gouv repository, which is more general.

Do you have a model dataset or one you would recommend as an example of a ‘clean’ deposit?

A good example is the dataset of the CiTIQUE project (citizens & ticks):

Durand, Jonas; Bah, Thierno-Madiou; Lebert, Isabelle; Galon, Clémence; Carravieri, Irene; Masseglia, Sébastien; Armand, Jean-Marc; Marchand, Julien; Galley, Cyril; Chalvet-Monfray, Karine; Vayssier-Taussat, Muriel; Vourc’h, Gwenaël; Brun-Jacob, Annick; Moutailler, Sara; Bailly, Xavier; Frey-Klett, Pascale, 2026, "Dataset of the distribution of tick-borne microorganisms in human-biting ticks in France collected through a Citizen-science program (CiTIQUE)", DOI : 10.57745/FIRZ0C.

Other datasets from Data INRAE are highlighted on this page of Recherche Data Gouv portal.

Find out more

• Institutional desk: datainrae[at]inrae.fr
• URL for the institutional space: https://entrepot.recherche.data.gouv.fr/dataverse/inrae
• Open science at INRAE: https://science-ouverte.inrae.fr

• Depositing Datasets, to learn how to deposit a dataset in the repository:
  • Thursday October 8th 2026 from 2 pm to 4 pm
  • Thursday December 3rd 2026 from 10 am to 12 pm
• Administering a collection, to learn how to manage a collection in the repository:
  • Tuesday September 8th 2026 from 10 am to 12 pm
  • Thursday November 12th 2026 from 2 pm to 4 pm
• Curation, to learn how to check metadata quality of submitted datasets, in line with FAIR principles:
  • Tuesday September 22nd 2026 from 10 am to 12 pm
  • Thursday November 26th from 10 am to 12 pm
• Discovering the Recherche Data Gouv repository's APIs' , to discover how to use repository functionalities from scripts or information systems:
  • Thursday September 17th 2026 from 2 pm to 4 pm
  • Tuesday November 17th 2026 from 10 am to 12 pm
• Using the Recherche Data Gouv repository APIs', to learn the more in-depth use of APIs (Application Programming Interfaces) through practical exercises.
  • Tuesday October 13th 2026 from 10 am to 12 pm
  • Thursday December 3rd 2026 from 2 pm to 4 pm

These virtual training courses are open to everyone, with no prior registration required. A single access link can be used for all sessions:  https://webinaire.numerique.gouv.fr/meeting/signin/invite/56058/creator/29902/hash/8cd70dea21f5c3eb984d52e4214d2e35cafb616f

Throughout the year, you can also consult the Recherche Data Gouv repository guides, as well as the Recherche Data Gouv Catalogue guide (in french).

• For scientific publications: https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/hal-05650417
• For datasets published in repositories assigning DataCite DOIs: https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/hal-05650426

These two documents are permanently available via the footer of the Works-magnet website.

Before building these data, users are encouraged to update their institution's ROR identifier.

The submission of reliable data to the French Open Science Monitor (BSO) through these local implementations is essential for collectively improving the quality of monitoring these indicators.

The French Open Science Monitor is part of both the National Plan for Open Science (PNSO) and France's National Action Plan within the Open Government Partnership (OGP). It was developed in 2018 by the Data Engineering and Data Science team at the French Ministry of Higher Education, Research and Space (MESRE) to support and monitor the national Open Science public policy. Since 2023, its beta version has also enabled the monitoring of published datasets and software. This new feature is the result of a collaboration between the team responsible for the Monitor at the MESRE, the University of Lorraine, and INRIA.

The latest webinar recording from the BSO Users' Club is now available on the website: https://barometredelascienceouverte.esr.gouv.fr/a-propos/communication#users-club 

This is the point of the guide co-published by Crossref and DataCite, two key infrastructures in the open science ecosystem: Why metadata matters for research integrity and how to contribute. It compares the specific metadata provided by these two infrastructures and calls for them to be used as tools for analysing scientific integrity.

Amdekar, M., Chen, X., Cousijn, H., El-Gebali, S., Feeney, P., Hendricks, G., & Stathis, K. (2026). Why metadata matters for research integrity and how to contribute. 
Available on Zenodo.
 

Find out more about metadata in the Recherche Data Gouv repository
• Metadata section of the Online Help
• FAQ Metadata section

To read or reread
• The checklist of the ‘Collège Données de la recherche’ (french Committee for Open Science) to facilitate the documentation of data using metadata : Faciliter la documentation des données grâce aux métadonnées dans un projet de recherche (2025)

Led by a dedicated organizing committee—Erwan Guillou, Thomas Jouneau, and Rachel Prost (Recherche Data Gouv), Jennifer Palethorpe (University of Nantes), Lucie Marie (Sciences Po Paris), as well as Frédérique Gros and Alena Lapatniova (Progedo)—the Curathon provided an opportunity to learn, exchange ideas, and innovate together in a friendly and collaborative atmosphere.

A Variety of Approaches

Compared with the previous edition, this year's Curathon featured a wider range of formats. This evolution placed greater emphasis on metadata quality, showcasing a rich diversity of approaches and content. Here is an overview of the initiatives:

• Marseille: Held in a focused and productive atmosphere at the Saint-Charles campus university library, the day combined an introduction to the Recherche Data Gouv ecosystem, a presentation of the Dat'AMU repository, and a researcher’s feedback on her experience. The event produced tangible outcomes: 2 curated datasets, 3 newly created collections, and 3 requests for laboratory support.
• Besançon BFC: For the Bourgogne–Franche-Comté team, the Curathon was first and foremost an opportunity for in-person exchanges between research data librarians who usually work far apart geographically. The session proved especially productive: 29 ORCID identifiers were added, Research Organization Registry (ROR) identifiers for institutions were finalized, 28 projects were created in the dedicated registry, and 73 datasets, including nine collections, were identified for linking to the regional institutional repository.
• EcoDoR (Montepellier): The EcoDoR edition focused on demystifying data curation by presenting current practices implemented by members of the network. With 19 participants, half of whom were newcomers, the day emphasized training through a collective demonstration, the use of Recherche Data Gouv's curation report template, and hands-on exercises using 3 fictional datasets deposited in the repository's sandbox environment. By the end of the day, participants were able to complete a curation report and had reflected on their own curation policies, including file formats and quality criteria.
• Poitiers: The Poitiers edition took the form of a mini-symposium bringing together 24 participants (17 on site and 7 online) around metadata quality tools. Eight tools were presented in workshop sessions: AMIS, Maggot, Nakala, Madbot, the Recherche Data Gouv catalogue, UCLR, elabFTW, and assist_moderation-Nkl. Each presentation highlighted the tool's objectives, scope, limitations, and potential synergies with other solutions. The role of artificial intelligence in metadata management emerged as a common theme throughout the discussions.
• Paris CDSP (Sciences Po): With around 40 participants from diverse backgrounds, this edition focused on awareness-raising and training. The morning plenary sessions covered CoreTrustSeal, the Centre for Socio-Political Data (CDSP) guides for data dissemination, the RésIn network, the Progedo catalogue, and the DataV tool. In the afternoon, three parallel workshops explored metadata standards, data anonymization, and data curation within Recherche Data Gouv, laying the foundation for the next editions with a stronger practical focus.

Curathons were also organized in Avignon, Grenoble, Lyon, Nancy, Nantes, and Strasbourg. While many organizers returned after taking part in the 2025 edition, new cities also joined the initiative, including La Rochelle, Poitiers, and Montpellier. Altogether, 150 participants received training, expanded their knowledge, practiced curation techniques, and exchanged ideas on this key aspect of research data management.

What's Next?

This second edition confirms the growing enthusiasm for Curathons and highlights the need for opportunities to come together and discuss research data documentation.
As Curathons gradually become recurring events, the role of the organizing committee is expected to evolve toward coordinating the various local initiatives.
Next year, the committee will continue supporting local organizers in setting up their Curathons. It will also place greater emphasis on communication in order to reach a broader audience, both among prospective organizers and participants.

See you next year to continue collaborating on new research data curation projects!

Call for Expressions of Interest

If you would like to:

• Join the organizing committee,
• Participate in Curathon 2027,
• Be contacted about the next Curathon,
• Share your ideas or feedback,

please contact: curathon-comite-organisation[at]groupes.renater.fr 

To stay informed about future Curathon activities, feel free to subscribe to the newsletter by emailing: curathon[at]groupes.renater.fr 

This catalog highlights France’s scientific heritage. It lists:

• Data produced or co-produced by researchers affiliated with a French institution.
• Data deposited in repositories managed by French institutions, regardless of the authors’ nationality.

Starting today, the catalog offers automated indexing of repositories identified as priorities. The list of repositories will be updated over time.

To facilitate your searches, the catalog uses artificial intelligence technologies:

• Semantic and multilingual search to formulate your queries naturally and find datasets, whether they are described in French or English.
• AI helps connect the terms in your search to the data descriptions, making exploration more fluid and intuitive.

The Recherche Data Gouv catalog was designed as a cross-disciplinary search layer, intentionally simple and lightweight. That is why it focuses solely on the general presentation of “datasets.”

It is not intended to replace existing discipline-specific platforms. Specific complexities (domain-specific vocabularies, highly specialized searches) remain managed by the original repositories.

Discover this tool designed to simplify the discovery and reuse of research data today!

Access to the catalog: https://catalogue.recherche.data.gouv.fr

Choosing an appropriate repository is a key factor in ensuring high-quality metadata, increasing data visibility, and enabling reuse. The list is not intended to be exhaustive but to provide reliable guidance: the absence of a repository does not imply that it is not trustworthy.

This new version is the result of extensive harmonization and standardization of the information describing already listed repositories. This work enables a clearer and more consistent display on the Recherche Data Gouv portal, with enriched information, particularly regarding repository sustainability and embargo conditions.

The evaluation criteria remain unchanged compared to the previous version of the methodological guidelines.

Several new thematic repositories have been added:

• Social Sciences and Humanities: Pangloss, dedicated to rare languages
• Astronomy and Astrophysics: Kinetic Database for Astrochemistry (KIDA) and the Centre de Données de Physique des Plasmas (CDPP)
• Biology: Image Data Resource (IDR) in cell biology and BioImage Archive in bioimaging

The list is intended to evolve over time. Research communities are encouraged to suggest repositories that could be included, in line with the criteria defined in the methodological note.

This collective effort was made possible thanks to the contributions of the dedicated working group, coordinated in particular by Cécile Arènes and Marie-Emilia Herbet.

The updated list and its methodology are available online on the Recherche Data Gouv website.

Interview avec l'équipe des administrateurs / curateurs de l'espace institutionnel de l'Université de Montpellier :

Quelles disciplines sont représentées par ces données principalement ?

De nombreuses disciplines sont représentées : sciences de la terre et de l'environnement ; biodiversité ; écologie ; sciences de l'agriculture ; sciences de la vie, de la santé et de la médecine ; ingénierie ; physique, systèmes ; sciences de l'Informatique ; chimie ; sciences sociales ; mathématiques.

Quel est le processus pour déposer des données ?  Pour créer une collection ?

Chaque déposant doit être authentifié via ses identifiants “shibboleth” de l'Université de Montpellier pour pouvoir déposer dans l'espace institutionnel de l'université. Chaque unité de recherche ayant déposé des jeux de données dans l'espace institutionnel dispose d'une collection. Les demandes de création de collection se font auprès de notre équipe de curation. L'équipe veille régulièrement à créer une collection si des jeux de données de l'unité sont identifiés.

Quelle curation est assurée sur l’espace ?

Chaque jeu de données déposé dans l'espace est relu par notre équipe de curation avant d'être retourné pour modifications éventuelles au déposant. Ce processus est appliqué à chaque nouvelle soumission.

 Y a t-il une articulation avec d’autres entrepôts ?

Oui, du fait de la présence d'unités multi-tutelles et dans le cadre de l'atelier EcoDoR et de l'organisation d'événements (curathon, etc.), l'espace s'articule avec les autres espaces institutionnels et instances Dataverse des partenaires de l'Université, tels que DataSuds, data.InDoRES, etc.

Avez-vous un jeu de données modèle ou recommandé comme exemple d’un dépôt “propre” ?

Nous proposons comme modèle ce jeu de données déposé dans la collection du Laboratoire de Mécanique et de Génie Civil.

Pour en savoir plus

Guichet contact de l’espace institutionnel : https://ecodor.libanswers.com/form?queue_id=3267
Lien vers l’espace institutionnel : https://entrepot.recherche.data.gouv.fr/dataverse/umontpellier 
L'atelier de la donnée Ecodor : https://atelier-ecodor.edu.umontpellier.fr